Capture
The care team records conversation, notes or audio without interrupting the conversation.
Quinn wird geladen...
SIS intake
AI-assisted SIS-style intake documentation for care teams
Quinn supports the step before the resident record: conversations, notes and audio become a structured draft with open cues and human approval.
Quinn
Review-first workflow
Capture intake conversation, context and notes in one review-first flow.
Prepare resources, risks and wishes for SIS-style documentation.
Make open information visible before anything is transferred into the existing system.
Problem
Why intake documentation becomes a bottleneck
The hard part is translating fragmented real-world conversation into neutral, complete and reviewable documentation before it enters the system.
Intake conversations mix biography, risks, resources and wishes in no fixed order.
Care teams need gap cues without turning the conversation into a rigid checklist.
Existing systems store the record, but do not solve the drafting bottleneck before it.
Adoption requires clear responsibility, approval and processing boundaries.
Workflow
Conversation → draft → gaps → approval → transfer
Quinn does not create a final record entry. It creates a reviewable SIS-style draft for professional editing and approval.
Structure
Quinn organises content into care-specific sections and open cues.
Review
The team edits, validates and resolves missing information.
Transfer
Approved content can be copied or exported into the existing system.
What Quinn does not do
The narrow scope is intentional: Quinn avoids high-risk automation and focuses on the reviewable drafting step.
Quinn is not a resident record or care software replacement.
Quinn does not make autonomous care decisions.
Time savings are measured in pilots, not claimed in advance.
Real resident data starts only after roles, processing path and agreements are clarified.
Pilotmetriken
Pilot metrics
The pilot measures whether Quinn creates real value and adoption signals in care workflows.
Minutes per case
Time from conversation or notes to a reviewable SIS-style draft.
Edit rate
How much the team edits before the draft is professionally acceptable.
Completeness
Which resources, risks, wishes or missing facts still need clarification.
Care/QM review effort
Review workload before and after Quinn for care leadership or quality teams.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Does Quinn replace our care software?
No. Quinn creates reviewable drafts before the existing system. The resident record and the system of record remain in place.
Does Quinn make professional care decisions?
No. Quinn supports drafting, structuring and review. Professional judgement and approval stay with the care or quality team.
How does a pilot work?
We start with a bounded intake, SIS-style or review workflow, define metrics and evaluate usage, quality and relief after 4–6 weeks.
How is Quinn different from voice documentation?
Voice can be an input. Quinn's product value is the review-first draft with gap cues, human approval and transfer logic.
Pilot-ready
Test SIS-style intake in a pilot workflow.
We are looking for care partners who want to walk through a realistic intake case and evaluate where a reviewable draft can reduce documentation load.